Italiano
English
Español
Français
Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer, born in 1935 in Frisia, Germany, studied medicine and theology at the University of Tuebingen. At the age of 22, he completed his master’s degree in theology and then, four years later, received his professional license as a doctor of medicine. The following years he practiced at various university clinics in Germany.
In 1972, Dr. Hamer completed his specialization in internal medicine and began to work at the University clinic in Tuebingen as an internist in charge of cancer patients. At the same time, he ran a private practice with his wife Dr. Sigrid Hamer, whom he had met during their studies in Tuebingen. He also showed an extraordinary talent for inventing medical devices. Among others, he owns the patent for a non-traumatic scalpel (Hamer Scalpel) which cuts twenty times sharper than a razor blade, a special bone saw for plastic surgery, and a massage table that automatically adjusts to the body’s contours.
His inventions provided Dr. Hamer and his family with the financial means to move to Italy, where he realized his plan to treat the sick in the slums of Rome free of charge. On August 18th, 1978, while in Rome, the Hamers received the shocking news that their son Dirk had been accidentally shot by the Italian Prince Victor Emanuel of Savoy. On December 7th, 1978, Dirk succumbed to the injuries and died in his father’s arms. Dirk is buried under the city wall at the pyramid in Rome.
Shortly after Dirk’s death, Dr. Hamer was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Since he had never been seriously ill, he postulated that the development of his cancer could be directly related to the unexpected loss of his son. In fact, he would eventually, in honor of Dirk, call this unexpected shock a DHS or “Dirk Hamer Syndrome”.
Dirk’s death and his own experience with cancer set Dr. Hamer on an extraordinary scientific journey.
At the time head internist of a cancer clinic at the University of Munich, he began to investigate his cancer patients’ histories and soon learned that, like him, they all had experienced an unexpected shock of one sort or another. But he took his research even further. Pursuing the hypothesis that all bodily processes are controlled from the brain, he analyzed his patients’ brain scans and compared them with their medical records and personal histories. To his amazement, he found a clear correlation between certain type of “conflict shocks”, how these shocks manifest themselves on the organ level as specific symptoms and how all this is connected to the brain. Until then, no studies had examined the role of the brain as the mediator between the psyche and a diseased organ.
Dr. Hamer established that every disease originates from a shock or trauma that catches an individual completely by surprise. The moment the unexpected conflict occurs, the shock strikes a specific, predetermined area in the brain causing a lesion (later called Hamer Focus or HH – Hamerscher Herd), visible on a brain scan as a set of sharp concentric rings. Before Dr. Hamer identified these ringed lesions on a brain scan, radiologists considered them as artifacts created by a glitch in the machine. But Siemens, a manufacturer of computer tomography equipment, certified that these target lesions cannot be artifacts because even when the tomography is repeated and taken from different angles, the same ring formation always appears in the same location.
The brain cells that receive the shock (DHS) send a biochemical signal to the corresponding body cells causing the growth of a tumor, a meltdown of tissue, or functional loss, depending on which part of the brain is involved. The reason why specific conflicts are irrefutably tied to specific areas in the brain is that during the development of the human organism each brain area was programmed to respond instantly to situations that could threaten survival. While the brainstem, the oldest part of the brain, is programmed with primordial conflicts related to breathing (death-fright conflicts) reproduction (procreation conflicts) and food (morsel conflicts), the cerebrum, the youngest part of the brain, correlates to more advanced matters (separation conflicts, territorial conflicts). Dr. Hamer also discovered that every disease progresses in two phases: first, a conflict-active phase, characterized by emotional distress, a lack of appetite, and sleeplessness, and then, provided the conflict can be resolved, a healing phase. This is the period in which the psyche, the brain and the affected organ undergo the phase of recovery, an often difficult process marked by fatigue, headaches, inflammation, “infections”, and pain.
Firmly anchored in the science of embryology and in full accordance with evolutionary logic, Dr. Hamer called his findings “The Five Biological Laws of the New Medicine”. Over the years, he was able to confirm his discoveries with over 40,000 case studies.
Dr. Hamer’s research radically upsets the many existing theories of conventional medicine. His explanation of disease as a meaningful interplay between the psyche, the brain and the corresponding organ refutes the view that disease occurs by chance or as a result of a mistake of Nature. Based on sound scientific criteria, German New Medicine shatters the myths of malignant cancer cells or of malevolent microbes and identifies “infectious diseases” as well as cancerous tumors as age-old emergency measures designed to save the organism and not, as we have been taught, to destroy it. Diseases such as cancer lose their frightening image and are recognized as meaningful biological survival programs every human being is born with.
In October 1981, Dr. Hamer submitted his research to the University of Tuebingen as a post-doctoral thesis. The objective was to have his findings tested on equivalent cases so that the New Medicine could be taught to all medical students and that patients could benefit from the discoveries as soon as possible. But to his great surprise, the University committee rejected his work and refused to evaluate his thesis. This is an unprecedented case in the history of universities! There was yet another surprise. Shortly after he had handed in his thesis, Dr. Hamer was given the ultimatum to either deny his findings or his contract would not be renewed. It was extremely difficult for him to understand why he was being expelled from the clinic for presenting well-substantiated scientific findings. Dr. Hamer stood his ground. After his dismissal, he retreated to his private practice where he continued his research. Several attempts to open a private clinic failed because of concerted efforts opposing it. Letters of Dr. Hamer’s patients to health officials remained unanswered or were returned with the comment: “Not applicable!”. To this day, the firm position of the authorities has not changed.
In 1985, after 29 years of marriage and the raising of four children, Sigrid Hamer died. She had never really recovered from the grief over the death of her son and the relentless intimidation by the Savoy family.
The harassment of Dr. Hamer culminated in 1986, when a court sentence stopped him from practicing medicine. Despite the fact that his scientific work had never been disproved, he lost, at the age of 51, his medical license on the grounds that he refused to renounce his findings on the origin of cancer and to conform to the principles of official medicine. Deprived of a medical license, Dr. Hamer now relied on other doctors to obtain brain scans and patients’ records. But he was determined to continue his work. By 1987 Dr. Hamer had already analyzed over 10,000 cases and was able to expand his discovery of the Five Biological Laws to practically all diseases known in medicine. Meanwhile, the press and the medical establishment stopped at nothing to attack him and his work. Tabloid journalists and medical “experts” portray Dr. Hamer as a charlatan, a self-proclaimed miracle healer, a cult leader, an irrational outsider, or an insane criminal who denies cancer patients the ‘life-saving’ conventional treatments.
As a result of the ongoing concerted effort to suppress Dr. Hamer’s medical discoveries, doctors as well as the populace at large have not been given a chance to benefit from the knowledge of GNM, and – for over 30 years- millions of patients have been denied to be treated according to German New Medicine with its humane, non-invasive approach.
The suffering caused by the censorship of Dr. Hamer’s discoveries
for patients and their loved ones is beyond measure.
In 1997, Dr. Hamer was arrested and sentenced to 19 months in prison for having given three people free medical information without a medical license. By contrast, in 1991, thirteen years after he had killed Dirk Hamer, Victor Emanuel of Savoy had been sentenced to a mere 6 months probation for the illegal possession of a weapon. When Dr. Hamer was arrested, the police searched his patient files. Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial that after more than five years, of 6500 patients with mostly ‘terminal’ cancer, 6000 were still alive. And so, ironically, it was his opponents that provided the actual statistics attesting to German New Medicine’s remarkable success rate. Yet, to this day, the University of Tuebingen refuses, despite court orders in 1986 and 1994, to test Dr. Hamer’s scientific work. Similarly, official medicine refuses to endorse GNM despite its numerous verifications by both physicians and professorial associations.
On September 9th, 2004, Dr. Hamer was arrested at his home in Spain. Following a European extradition order, Dr. Hamer was extradited to France, where he was held in the French prison Fleury-Mérogis. Dr. Hamer was sentenced to three years in prison without probation. The charges: “fraud and the complicity in the illegal practice of medicine”. He had been charged and found responsible for the deaths of French citizens due to the availability of his publications in French. It should be mentioned that Dr. Hamer had never spoken to any of the individuals in person.
Dr. Hamer was released from prison in February 2006. In March 2007, he was forced to leave his Spanish exile. He now resides in Sandefjord, Norway.
Doctor R. G. Hamer – Fourth Biological Law
-
the role of germs in disease and healing
Doctor R. G. Hamer – Fourth Biological Law
The little germs that surround and fill our bodies sure do have a bad rap these days. I’m scared of chemicals, so to me it seems as though there has been a wave of “germophobia” in the last couple decades that has everyone dousing themselves in all kinds of microbe-killing chemicals to ward off the threat posed by these invisible creatures.
It wasn’t always so; we haven’t been so terrified of cooties all along. But when our society did start being scared of microscopic organisms, we walloped them with every weapon we could get our hands on!
In the 1950’s spirit of “better living through chemistry,” housewives painted their kitchen shelves with DDT and lead to ward off the evil infectious spirits, and practically every little kid in North America had his tonsils removed because they were thought to harbour germs believed to be the cause of everything from sore throats to polio.
Rachel Carson was the first to really point out the rising suspicion that the chemicals being used to kill off germs were much more dangerous to our health – and the health of many other species – than the germs themselves. In 1962, she wrote a book called “Silent Spring” that set off the entire environmental movement. Those of you who, like me, are afraid of chemical toxins in the world around you, can thank Rachel Carson for triggering the environmental movement that made us all aware of the dangers of chemicals.
I wish she’d also dealt with the non-dangers of germs while she was at it. Despite the rise of “chemophobia,” a lot of people in our society are still more terrified of germs. It is the primary justification for our massive chemical sales industry – not to mention the very lucrative market for antibiotics and other germ-killing drugs!
Fear of cancer due to chemicals competes with fear of infection due to germs, in some kind of horrible balancing act that keeps many people in a state of near-constant hypochondriacal compulsiveness.
But now we know what really causes cancer and infection, so it’s time for society to stop being terrified, and start taking charge of our health.
So, what really is the role of germs – fungi, mycobacteria, bacteria, viruses – in disease? How do these microscopic critters fit into what we now know about the real causes and progression of the disease and healing process?
Germs are in our bodies all the time – yes, even cholera, tetanus and the other dreaded infectious microbes. But they only flare up and do anything under very specific circumstances.
Certain microbes, if present in our bodies at the time of the original DHS (conflict-shock experience), will participate, but only in the healing phase, of diseases.
This means that germs are neither the cause of the diseases – we know what the true cause of diseases is – nor are they participants in the conflict-active phase of any disease.
Opportunists
Microbes, if present, participate in the healing phase of diseases by opportunistically consuming excess tissues that the body no longer needs when it moves into the healing phase of a disease process.
Even more specifically, infection-related germs only participate in old-brain governed disease healing processes.
When the psyche, brain and body function of old-brain biological processes are activated by a conflict-shock experience, the relevant old-brain directs the body to create more and more tissue in the affected body area in order to increase the functional capability of that tissue.
Later, when the conflict experience is resolved, the psyche and brain “shut off” these excess tissues that were built during the conflict-active phase, because they are no longer necessary to the body. In fact, they’re now just clutter. As a result of being shut off, the extra tissue becomes dead tissue.
Germs – fungi, mycobacteria, and bacteria – will consume this extra, dead tissue. They will not consume live tissue that is still being innervated (electrically-controlled) by the brain.
The resulting microscopic population explosion that occurs as a result of the germ population in that part of the body suddenly having a new “food” source is called “infection.” However, the idea that the germs cause the infection is a deeply unscientific cultural myth that has been scaring our society into buying a lot of expensive (and sometimes dangerous) chemicals and medications for about six or seven decades now.
(Actually, the germ theory of disease has been around a bit longer than that, but it was only in the 40’s and 50’s that the general population rejected its flaws, embraced the theory, and got into the ecologically-dangerous practice of actually trying to eradicate germs from our bodies and our surroundings )
Microorganisms do not cause disease, they are simply participants in the removal of dead tissues. This is exactly analogous to the fact that insects do not cause garbage, but are often opportunistic participants in the breakdown of garbage.
In Nature, there is no waste. Energy that was brought into our bodies as extra tissue to try and deal with a situation that we didn’t have enough energy to deal with at the moment that it occurred does not linger in the body after it is no longer needed. Instead, the same thing happens to it as happens to the rest of our body after we are no longer using it: fungi, mycobacteria, and bacteria consume the materials that were once part of our body, and they convert that energy back into usable materials that can be used by the food web for the rest of the Community of Life.
If creation continues for our entire lives, so does death and recycling. Ashes to ashes.
Microbes in Our Ontogeny
The participation of germs in healing of our diseases has evolved right along with the formation of our four brains and our four body systems.
Because of this, the very oldest functions of our body involve one oldest type of animal microbes – the fungi. Fungi particularly become active in our very oldest body function, relating to getting food morsels into and out of our bodies. This means that fungi – such as candida yeasts – are the active microbes during the healing phase of conflict experiences that have involved our intestinal tract.
Later in history, more complicated digestive functions, such as the processing of air, water, and light, were also governed by the old-brain. These more sophisticated functions still involve microbes, but more sophisticated microbes called mycobacteria, which are usually called tuberculosis. Mycobacteria are single-celled creatures that have the properties of both fungus and bacteria.
Tuberculosis mycobacteria, if they were present in the body at the time of a DHS relating to a problem with processing air, water, or light, participate in the healing phase of conflicts that involved the lungs, the kidney collecting tubules, or the irises of the eyes.
The other old-brain function, our protective corium skin that envelops our body and several of our vital internal organ systems, builds tissue during the conflict-active phase of an experience of “attack” against our physical body. Bacteria, which are more sophisticated than mycobacteria or fungi, participate in the breakdown of these extra protective tissues when the conflict has been resolved.
Hey, What About Viruses?
The whole theory of pathogenic (disease-causing) viruses is seriously flawed. The idea of a bit of dead DNA that can’t even reproduce itself somehow coordinating en masse to invade a living, intelligently-designed cell millions or billions of times larger than itself, then taking over the cell’s entire reproductive apparatus in order to duplicate itself, and then killing the cell in order to meaninglessly go on to attack even more cells…
… well, “far-fetched” is a gentle way of putting the hypothesis.
In fact, a disease-causing virus has never, ever been isolated, characterized and described. Viruses have never even been collected from diseased tissues in order to blame them for causing the diseases. Pathogenic viruses are completely hypothetical.
Nevertheless, if disease-causing viruses exist, they are participants in the healing phase of new-brain governed diseases, which would mean that they participate by helping to re-build deteriorated tissues that are controlled by the new-brain. This means that, if they exist, they are somehow present while bone, blood, lymph, muscle, and skin tissues heal themselves.
Perhaps viruses, which are really little bits of inert DNA that aren’t complete enough to do any kind of lifelike activity, are used as raw material to physically repair tissues that have been lost in the conflict-active phase of a disease.
The Appropriate Use of Antibiotics and Germ-Killing Chemicals
Antibiotics do not need to be used to completely eliminate microbes from our bodies, because these microbes for the most part are actually helpers in our system, participating in the process of dissolving and clearing out tissues that we no longer need for our optimal functioning. Antibiotics can be helpful, however, if they are used sparingly in order to reduce severe healing phase symptoms that follow the resolution of a severe conflict-shock experience.
As for using germ-killing chemicals to sanitize our external environment, this practice has gone way overboard in our daily lives. Good old soap and water is the the best choice in 95% of all situations. We do need to keep our homes and bodies clean and tidy, but banishing all microscopic life from the world around us is not only impossible and unnecessary, the attempt to do so is ecologically very, very damaging. Therefore, it is a threat to our own overall health and well-being.
The only reason we need to keep our bodies and homes somewhat clean and tidy, is because an organized life is one in which we are much less likely to encounter conflict experiences (such as stepping on a rusty nail, not being able to conveniently create a good meal, or sleeping in a cold bed) that could lead to disease symptoms. In fact, an experience of filthiness or dirtiness in and of itself can constitute a conflict-shock experience.
But, for people like me that are scared of harsh chemicals, a noseful of bleach or the taste of strong hand-sanitizer chemicals on my lips constitutes a much worse offense to my psyche, brain, and body than does a bit of mud.
Devi essere loggato per rispondere a questa discussione.
